Beyond the PDF: Why biopharma’s communication must catch up with Its science

Tamanna Khanna, Co-founder of Agram Konnect, explains why biopharma must transform communication formats to match scientific pace and gain a competitive edge

Biopharma has outgrown its formats. The industry is advancing at record speed, but still relies on PDFs, static slide decks, and compliance-heavy reports to carry its message. These formats may satisfy process, but they no longer serve purpose. They are slow, opaque, and poorly suited to a world where trust and speed are strategic levers.

What will define the next era is not more content, but new formats that drive comprehension and accelerate decisions. Audio-visual frameworks are emerging as that lever. The shift has begun investors, regulators, and patients are already responding differently when complex ideas are shown, not just told.

The cost of standing still

Biopharma’s science is complex, but its communication cannot be. In markets from the US to Israel, investors now expect MoA animations as part of biotech pitches. Regulators in Europe and Korea are embedding digital submissions as standard. Patients in multilingual environments from Singapore to India struggle without localised, video-first explanations.

When companies persist with static formats, the cost is tangible: delayed reviews, underfunded ventures, and patients who disengage. Format is no longer a cosmetic choice; it is a performance variable.

Signals of the visual turn

  • Regulators are digitising. eCTD is mandatory in the US and EU, while Korea is modernising review systems. This creates the infrastructure for richer formats to accompany dossiers.
  • Investors want clarity. In Israel’s biotech ecosystem, visual explainers are standard in funding conversations because they shorten comprehension cycles.
  • Patients learn visually. Studies show video-based education outperforms text in retention and adherence. In diverse, multilingual markets this is not optional it is essential.
  • Sustainability is scrutinised. GCC markets expect ESG proof, not promises. Immersive, data-driven storytelling is becoming the benchmark for credibility.

These signals point to one conclusion: the shift from text-heavy to visual-first is already underway.

What holds back adoption

Creativity is not the issue. Biopharma has no shortage of design talent or storytelling partners. The real barrier is process. AV content today is rarely governed like data. It lacks metadata standards, traceability, audit trails, and compliance sign-offs. Without these, regulators will never treat a video as evidence. Until workflows catch up, AV will remain supplemental, not central.

The imperatives for leaders

  1. Elevate format to strategy. Stop treating AV as marketing collateral. Treat it as a channel for science, regulation, and investment.
  2. Govern AV like data. Build versioning, references, and compliance into every asset. An animation should be as auditable as a clinical dataset.
  3. Pilot with purpose. Use AV in one regulatory or investor interaction. Capture measurable impact—shorter comprehension cycles, faster discussions and build momentum from there.
  4. Industrialise production. Create validated templates and pipelines for repeatable AV formats: MoA animations, protocol walk-throughs, ESG narratives. Scale requires standardisation.

The new advantage

Biopharma’s edge will no longer be determined only by its molecules, but by how effectively it moves those molecules through scrutiny, funding, and adoption. Companies that master visual-first communication will not just look modern; they will operate faster, secure trust earlier, and scale more effectively.

The future will still be written—but the leaders will ensure it is also seen. The mandate now is to govern formats with the same rigor as data because evidence without clarity is no longer evidence at all.

 

audio-visual sciencebiopharma communicationMoA animationsregulated digital formatsvisual-first content
Comments (0)
Add Comment